A Vote for Ignorance: Examining Anti-Science Republican Candidates
Written on
Understanding the Anti-Science Stance in Politics
This discussion continues to highlight U.S. presidential contenders who reject scientific facts. I aim to concentrate solely on this critical issue, setting aside my broader concerns about their ideologies. Prioritizing personal beliefs over empirical evidence can lead to significant consequences, and unfortunately, there is no shortage of candidates eager to embrace chaos. Here, I will examine three notable figures from the Republican Party. (For the Democratic perspective, please refer to the linked content.)
Mike Pence: An Old-School Science Denialist
Pence embodies a traditional form of science skepticism. While many candidates engage with current scientific debates—such as those surrounding vaccines and climate change—Pence sticks to outdated notions. In 2000, he claimed, “Despite the hysteria from the political class and the media, smoking doesn’t kill.” He later acknowledged the dangers of smoking but incorrectly asserted that only one in three smokers dies from it, contradicting his earlier statement. Recent statistics indicate that 50-67% of long-term smokers may die from smoking-related illnesses.
In a 2002 address to Congress, Pence criticized the teaching of evolution, stating that Darwin lacked evidence for his theory, a sentiment that is fundamentally misinformed. Additionally, during a CNN interview that same year, he inaccurately described condoms as ineffective against STDs, despite substantial evidence to the contrary.
Pence's remarks on climate change in 2009 reflected a misunderstanding of the consensus within the scientific community, claiming that skepticism about global warming was growing. Unfortunately, this was far from the reality.
While he did promote vaccination by receiving a COVID vaccine publicly, Pence's prior statements firmly establish his position within the realm of science denial.
Ron DeSantis: Fueling the Culture War
DeSantis ranks alongside Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his opposition to essential vaccines. As Florida's governor, he notably shared a platform with an anti-vaccine advocate who falsely claimed that the COVID vaccine alters RNA. He appointed Joseph Ladapo as state surgeon general, who questioned vaccine safety and advised citizens to trust their instincts over scientific evidence. Ladapo also made misleading claims regarding the COVID vaccine's association with increased cardiac deaths.
DeSantis took legal action against the CDC to prevent cruise lines from enforcing vaccination mandates and issued an executive order prohibiting schools from enforcing mask-wearing. Moreover, he enacted laws preventing Florida cities from pursuing 100% clean energy initiatives, insisting that fossil fuels remain a part of the energy mix. Despite undertaking efforts to safeguard Florida’s coastlines from rising sea levels, he dismisses carbon emission reductions as “left-wing stuff.”
In summary, DeSantis appears to revel in transforming scientific issues into culture wars, amplifying public outrage in the process.
Donald Trump: A Disregard for Scientific Truth
Trump's approach is less about outright denial and more a reflection of a self-centered attitude that disregards scientific principles. His initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic was lackluster, yet he later sought to associate himself with the expedited vaccine development through Operation Warp Speed. His record includes:
- Promoting the false narrative that vaccines lead to autism.
- Advocating for ineffective COVID treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, even sharing a platform with conspiracy theorists.
- Appointing Scott Atlas, a radiologist with no relevant expertise in infectious diseases, to the COVID task force, who spread misinformation about the virus.
- Suggesting on-air the dangerous idea of injecting disinfectants to combat COVID.
On climate issues, Trump actively suppressed the work of scientists studying climate change, attempted to prevent discussions on the subject within Congress, and appointed climate change deniers to pivotal positions. He also reversed over 100 environmental regulations aimed at curbing global warming.
In conclusion, Trump’s numerous anti-science actions would pose a significant threat to progress and education should he return to power.
Looking Ahead: The Broader Republican Landscape
Currently, seven other Republican candidates are in the race. If any emerge as serious contenders, I may delve into their scientific positions more thoroughly. The refusal to acknowledge evident truths is a long-standing tactic used by both politicians and unruly children alike.