Chapter 1: Presidential Remarks on UAP Shootdowns

In a recent address regarding the three Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) that were taken down, President Biden opted not to speak from the Oval Office, which many found disappointing. His appearance was largely influenced by pressure from U.S. Senators across party lines who were eager for a public statement.

You can view President Biden's remarks here:

Biden mentioned, "We don’t know exactly what these objects were..." but followed up with, "The intelligence community’s current assessment is that these objects were most likely balloons associated with private companies, recreational activities, or research institutions."

If this is indeed the case, and these objects were part of legitimate research from companies or universities, or even the result of an individual's experimentation, one must wonder about the rationale behind launching scientific instruments that don't transmit any data back.

Reports from both the Pentagon and other informed officials indicate that these objects emitted no electromagnetic signals and lacked a heat signature, suggesting they were uncrewed. Notably, these items were sufficiently large to be detected by NORAD radar once their systems were properly calibrated. They warranted the deployment of F-22 fighter jets and the use of AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles for the first time in 65 years over North American airspace.

If these objects belonged to someone on Earth, they must be aware by now that their assets have been destroyed. If they were conducting scientific research, they undoubtedly recognize the impact of losing such valuable equipment. It is their civic duty to communicate this information.

While it is possible that these objects were launched by individuals with dubious intentions, one would expect the intelligence community to have some insight into such scenarios. Are organizations like S.H.I.E.L.D. truly operational, or is that just a figment of fiction?

Alternatively, if the funding for these aerial devices came from a corporation or research facility, surely they would wish to disclose this information to ease public concern and potentially file for damages.

Failing to provide clarity leaves us with lingering skepticism about official narratives. The initial credibility crisis surrounding UAP dates back to July 7, 1947, when the Army Air Force announced the recovery of a "flying disk," only to later claim it was merely a weather balloon.

With the documents that have surfaced since then, it is clear that misinformation was prevalent. If these latest UAP were indeed balloons, it would have been simple for the Pentagon to affirm that fact. Yet, they have not done so.

They possess the data, including visuals captured by advanced sensor systems and high-resolution targeting from fighter jets, yet they are withholding this information. As noted by some Senators after their briefing, even Congress is not privy to certain imagery. The general public, even less so.

The repercussions of the Roswell deception are now surfacing, and with the 31 pages of UAP stipulations in the National Defense Appropriations Act of 2023—signed into law by Biden—it is evident that Congress is no longer easily misled regarding UAP matters.

For the moment, the intelligence community appears content to float along with another balloon narrative. Therefore, if you are the owner of the property that was shot down, please reach out! Your transparency would be met with appreciation and goodwill beyond what you might expect.

Reflecting on the implications of having shot something down, it’s clear: there’s no turning back.

Chapter 2: The Significance of UAP Shootdowns

Unprecedented and forceful actions have been taken against unidentified aerial phenomena. How do we reconcile this with our desire for peaceful interactions?

I appreciate you taking the time to engage with my writing. If you're interested in subscribing to Medium for access to over 50 articles, along with many other exceptional writers, please use this link. For those who prefer Patreon, here’s that option. If you'd like to support via BuyMeACoffee, you can do so here.