# Examining the Paradox of Divine Intervention and Suffering
Written on
Chapter 1: Divine Intervention and Its Implications
Recently, following a near-fatal attempt on his life, former President Donald Trump narrowly evaded death by shifting his head at just the right moment. This incident prompted many Christians to declare that divine intervention was at play, believing that God had intervened to spare him.
While some celebrated this perceived miracle, critics pointed out a significant inconsistency: the bullet that missed Trump tragically took the life of an innocent bystander. This situation raised difficult questions about why God would choose to save one individual while allowing another to perish, leaving many Christians searching for answers.
This event highlights a significant dilemma regarding the assertion of divine involvement in worldly affairs. When Christians claim that God is actively engaged in the world, saving lives and influencing occurrences, they often contradict their own explanations for the widespread suffering humanity endures.
Section 1.1: The Problem of Suffering
Every day, countless individuals endure immense pain and hardship. Conflicts ravage societies and take the lives of millions of innocent people. Just from malaria, around 600,000 lives are lost annually. If God exists, why does He permit such seemingly senseless and brutal suffering to continue?
Many believers argue that God has granted humanity free will to make its own choices. They contend that while God is aware of suffering and stands with those who endure it, He cannot contravene His principle of free will by intervening to prevent such suffering.
However, this argument presents a fundamental contradiction: many Christians do not genuinely adhere to this belief.
How can we be certain? Observing prayer practices reveals a different story. Christians often plead with God for intervention in their lives, sharing accounts of miraculous rescues from dire situations. A brief look at social media shows Christians attributing Trump's escape to divine protection.
In essence, when it suits their narrative, Christians argue that God permits suffering to uphold free will. Yet, when it is convenient, this principle appears to vanish, and suddenly, God is depicted as actively performing miracles for those they believe are favored.
Section 1.2: The Bigger Picture
This double standard is prevalent among Christians, primarily because they frequently fail to see the broader context. They do not recognize that the explanations they provide for one aspect of reality do not hold when applied to other situations.
This narrow perspective allows them to feel justified in their belief in an all-loving and all-powerful God merely because one of their prayers was answered. They might assert, “God must exist—how else could my child’s leukemia vanish after prayer?”
Yet, they overlook the reality that thousands of other children continue to suffer and die daily, despite countless prayers. Where is God in those circumstances? This exemplifies a clear case of tunnel vision.
Section 1.3: Confirmation Bias in Faith
When Christians suggest that if I had truly experienced God, I would never have lost my faith, they imply that only personal experience matters—overlooking the experiences of others. They often see no issue with this viewpoint, as it aligns with their approach to belief.
When I shared my past profound religious experiences and what I thought were miracles, they were perplexed. They couldn't understand why I would question those once cherished experiences, as they would never consider doing so themselves.
Their confusion stems from a belief that confirmation bias is entirely acceptable. They focus solely on their experiences while neglecting global realities. When confronted with contradictions, they often resort to explanations they may not fully believe themselves.
Chapter 2: The Mystery of God
Christians frequently invoke the mystery of God and human limitations when trying to explain the existence of widespread suffering. However, doing so undermines all their other explanations for divine intervention or lack thereof.
If they truly believe that God’s ways surpass human understanding, they cannot simultaneously assert that God respects free will, loves humanity, or promises salvation to the faithful. Such claims presuppose some level of understanding of God's actions, which is contradictory.
When Christians state they do not grasp why God allows suffering, it often serves as an excuse to evade confronting the clear discrepancies between their beliefs and observable reality.
Ultimately, it's not that Christians lack clarity on how a benevolent and omnipotent God should address suffering. They have a distinct idea of what that looks like. If Christians exhibited lower illness rates or if prayers consistently yielded results, they would readily cite these as evidence of divine love and intervention.
However, when their observations do not align with their conception of God, they revert to claiming that God’s ways are beyond our understanding, urging trust in His wisdom.
Last Thoughts
In summary, the inconsistencies in Christian reasoning regarding divine intervention and suffering reveal a troubling double standard. While many believers readily attribute favorable outcomes to divine influence, they struggle to reconcile this belief with the pervasive suffering that remains unaddressed.
By appealing to the mystery of God’s ways, they sidestep the contradictions between their beliefs and the surrounding reality. This selective reasoning not only weakens the argument for a benevolent and omnipotent deity but also exposes the pitfalls of relying solely on personal experience to validate faith.
By maintaining comforting explanations when convenient and retreating into mystery when challenged, they evade the difficult inquiries that arise when faith confronts the harsh truths of existence.
The first video titled "Does God Intervene In World Events?" explores the question of divine involvement in earthly affairs, examining the implications of such beliefs on our understanding of suffering.
The second video, "Does God Ever Intervene?" delves into the complexities of divine intervention and the challenges it presents to traditional beliefs about suffering and free will.